A Agilidade Organizacional e a Difusão de Inovação Tecnológica das Empresas Cleantech

Matheus  Eurico Soares de Noronha; Juliano  Barros Neves Martins; Tamires  Lietti; Rosemeire de Souza Vieira Silva

doi:10.24883/IberoamericanIC.v12i.2022.e0412

Authors

Matheus Eurico Soares de Noronha ESPM - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-6690
Juliano Barros Neves Martins Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM), São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0524-5520
Tamires Lietti Shanghai Jiao Tong University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-6435
Rosemeire de Souza Vieira Silva ESPM Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6260-6724

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24883/IberoamericanIC.v12i.2022.e0412

Keywords:

Cleantechs, organizational agility , technological diffusion, competitive advantage

Abstract

Context: Organizational environments have undergone major changes in the face of technological innovation advances in the industrial sectors. Looking at this context, technology startups have used increasingly technological and digital resources to delivery services and products with low or zero impact to the environment.

Objective: The paper aims to present a propositional model that encompasses the theoretical lenses of Organizational Agility (OA) by boosting Diffusion of Technological Innovation (DTI) in companies and clean technology to obtain Competitive Advantage (CV).

Methodology: A multiple case study with a qualitative approach was carried out with Cleantech organizations, supported by 22 semi-structured interviews from 17 clean technology companies in the areas of renewable energy, energy efficiency and commercialization in addition to water treatment. The results were supported by the content analysis technique.

Results: The AO can potentialize the DTI to achieve competitive advantage. Behind this, new categories were founded in this research: Agile Culture Values as a background for Digital Transformation to create a Smart Regulation to promote technological innovation in products and services at companies with sustainable solutions.

Contribution: This article contributes with a new model matching by the perspective of OA modify the positioning of managers and founders, to amplify the diffuser scenario of innovation and technology in the organization, reverberating in new market positions. The scientific contribution lists a research program based on the emerging categories of work, flowing into advances in the research field of Cleantech Organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Matheus Eurico Soares de Noronha, ESPM - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, São Paulo

PhD candidate in Management and International Business at ESPM (Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing/Brazil). Master’s degree in Consumer Behavior at ESPM (ESPM/Brazil) and Bacharel in Marketing at Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (Mackenzie/Brazil). MBA at Católica Porto Business School (CPBS/Portugal). Professional experience in the renewable energy sector, specifically in the wind energy industry in the areas of communication, strategy, and innovation. Scientific Researcher in Innovation, strategy, and international business.

Juliano Barros Neves Martins, Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM), São Paulo

Master’s degree candidate in Administration at ESPM (Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing/Brazil) and Bacharel in Chemical Engineering at Universidade Santa Cecília (UNISANTA/Brazil). Professional experience in the renewable energy sector at technical and regulatory area in the wind energy industry. Scientific Research in Engineering, Economy and Strategy and International Business.

Tamires Lietti, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Master in Communication and Social Media with Shanghai Jiaotong University, China (SJTU) and senior Journalist graduated from Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (Mackenzie/Brazil). Professional editor, copywriter and translator with four years of experience in the Chinese market and two years of actuation in the European market. Scientific researcher in innovation and cultural resources.

Rosemeire de Souza Vieira Silva, ESPM Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing, São Paulo

PhD candidate in Management and International Business at ESPM (Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing/Brazil). Master in Consumer Behavior from ESPM (ESPM/Brazil) and bachelor’s in business administration from Faculdade Instituto Superior de Ensino Alvorada Plus (Adventista/Brazil). Professional experience in an educational institution and multinational company in planning, budgeting, and cost reduction. Scientific researcher in the line of strategy, innovation, and business.

References

Albagli, S., & Maciel, M. L. (2004). Information and knowledge in innovation and local development. Information Science, 33, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652004000300002

Besanko, D. A., Doraszelski, U., Kryukov, Y., & Satterthwaite, M. A. (2007). Learning-By-Doing. Organizational Forgetting, and Industry Dynamics, Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper, (2128). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962878

Bjornali, E. S., & Ellingsen, A. (2014). Factors affecting the development of clean-tech start-ups: A literature review. Energy Procedia, 58, 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.407

Coombs, J. (1995). Jeronimo Pardo on the necessity of scientific propositions. Vivarium, 33(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568534952579803

Davydova, M. L., & Makarov, V. O. (2020, March). Smart Technologies in Lawmaking: Towards the Concept of Smart Regulation. In Institute of Scientific Communications Conference (pp. 1296-1305). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59126-7_142

De Guimarães, J. C. F. F., Severo, E., Dorion, E C H (2022). Product Innovation: Path to Sustainable Competitive Advantage with Use of Environmental, Social and Governance Principles Iberoamerican Journal of Corporate Governance 9(1), e 117. https://doi.org/10.21434/IberoamericanJCG.v9i1.117

de Noronha, M. E. S., Ferraro, D. M., Longo, L. R., & Melvin, S. S. (2022). The orchestration of dynamic capabilities in cleantech companies. Innovation & Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-08-2021-0144

Dedrick, J., & West, J. (2003, December). Why firms adopt open source platforms: a grounded theory of innovation and standards adoption. In Proceedings of the workshop on standard making: A critical research frontier for information systems (pp. 236-257).

DePietro, R., Wiarda, E., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The context for change: Organization, technology and environment: Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.

Doyle, G. J., Garrett, B., & Currie, L. M. (2014). Integrating mobile devices into nursing curricula: Opportunities for implementation using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation model. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 775-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.10.021

Dyer, L., & Shafer, R. A. (2003). Dynamic organizations: Achieving marketplace and organizational agility with people.

Felipe, C. M., Roldán, J. L., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2017). Impact of organizational culture values on organizational agility. Sustainability, 9(12), 2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122354

Furr, N., Ozcan, P. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2022). What is Digital Transformation? Fundamental Tensions faced by companies established in the World Scenario. Iberoamerican Journal of Competitive Intelligence, 12(1), e0410. https://doi.org/10.24883/IberoamericanIC.v12i.2022alumniin

Godoy, A. S. (1995). Qualitative research: fundamental types. Business Administration Magazine, 35, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75901995000300004

Goldman, S., Nagel, R. and Preiss, K. (1995), Agile Competitors and Virtual Organisations, van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.

Goncalves, D., Bergquist, M., Bunk, R., & Alänge, S. (2020). Cultural aspects of organizational agility affecting digital innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(4), 13-46. https://doi.org/10.7341/20201641

Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (2017). Smart regulation. Regulatory theory: Foundations and Applications, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.22459/RT.02.2017.08

Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(2), 675-686. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v31i2.9160

Ito, N. C., Hayashi Junior, P., Gimenez, F. A. P., & Fensterseifer, J. E. (2012). Value and competitive advantage: buscando definitions, relationships and repercussions. Contemporary Administration Magazine, 16, 290-307. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000200008

Jackson, M., & Johansson, C. (2003). An agility analysis from a production system perspective. Integrated Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060310491342

Lundblad, J. P. (2003). A review and critique of Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory as it applies to organizations. Organization Development Journal, 21(4), 50.

Mendes, R. M., & Miskulin, R. G. S. (2017). A análise de conteúdo como uma metodologia. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 47, 1044-1066. https://doi.org/10.1590/198053143988

Mrugalska, B., & Ahmed, J. (2021). Organizational agility in industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(15), 8272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158272

O'Hear, A. (1997). Karl Popper: philosophy and problems. UNESP. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18784

Pernick, R., & Wilder, C. (2007). Cleantech. the clean boom at the stock exchanges. How green technologies change our lives-and how investors can take advantage out of it; Cleantech. Der saubere (Boersen) Boom. Wie''gruene''Technologien unser Leben veraendern-und wie Anleger davon profitieren. Germany.

Perovano, D. G. (2016). Manual de metodologia da pesquisa científica. Curitiba: intersaberes.

Polyakov, M., & Kovshun, N. (2021). Diffusion of innovations as a key driver of the digital economy development. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(1), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-1-84-92

Popper, K. R. (1990). A world of propensities.

Popper, K. R., & Amado, M. (1998). Open society and its enemies (pp. 267-89). Itatiaia.

Porter, M. (2003). Michael Porter (1947-). Fifty Key Figures in Management, 272.

Porter, R. (1989). Health for sale: quackery in England, 1660-1850. Manchester University Press.

Rangel-Martinez, D., Nigam, K. D. P., & Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A. (2021). Machine learning on sustainable energy: A review and outlook on renewable energy systems, catalysis, smart grid and energy storage. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 174, 414-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.08.013

Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.002

Rogers, E. M., & Williams, D. (1983). Diffusion of. Innovations (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1962).

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.

Shakeel, S. R. (2021). Cleantech: Prospects and Challenges. Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), VIII-XVII. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_009.002_0002

Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007

Silva, A. H., & Fossá, M. I. T. (2015). Análise de conteúdo: exemplo de aplicação da técnica para análise de dados qualitativos. Qualitas revista eletrônica, 16(1).

Silva, H. D. C., & Casarin, S. J. (2011). Pesquisa cientifica: da teoria a pratica. Curitiba: Ibpex.

Silveira, F. L. D. (1996). Karl Popper's philosophy of science: critical rationalism. Santa Catarina's notebook for teaching physics. Florianópolis. Vol. 13, n. 3 (Dec. 1996), p. 197-218. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234987

Stake, R. E. (2008). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 119–149). Sage Publications, Inc.

Stoneman, P., & Diederen, P. (1994). Technology diffusion and public policy. The Economic Journal, 104(425), 918-930.

Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (1), 28-45.

Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington books. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1982.6447463

Van Gossum, P., Arts, B., & Verheyen, K. (2010). From “smart regulation” to “regulatory arrangements”. Policy Sciences, 43(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-010-9108-0

Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A., & Wieland, H. (2020). Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 116, 526-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038

Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation, 13-66. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008637-4

Wang, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2019). The impact of deep learning on organizational agility. 1-9.

Yin, R. K. (2015). Case Study: Planning and métodos. Bookman editor.

Zappellini, M. B., & Feuerschütte, S. G. (2015). O uso da triangulação na pesquisa científica brasileira em administração. Administração: ensino e pesquisa, 16(2), 241-273.

Zitkienė, R., & Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational agility conceptual model. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7