The BAH! Method: proposal for a method for feasibility analysis and implementation of SDG in brazilian municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24883/eagleSustainable.v13i.422Keywords:
Bah! Method, SDG, Brazilian Municipalities, Sustainable Development, Design Science Research, Bah! Método, ODS, Municípios Brasileiros, Desenvolvimento SustentávelAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to propose a method, analyzing the feasibility and implementation of SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) in Brazilian municipalities, examining the reality of each one. The central question is: what is being done to put the 2030 Agenda into practice in Brazilian municipalities?
Methodology/approach: DSR (Design Science Research) was used as a methodological basis, as it allows the creation of artifacts, which, during their development, can build theories that describe, explain and predict how reality is defined, in general. In this case, the objective of the method is to analyze local characteristics, verifying the practical implementation of the SDGs in Brazilian municipalities.
Originality/Relevance: this research resulted in Bah! Method, also developing Bah Seal! which plays an effective indicator role, with the aim of improving the present situation and future performance, creating a pioneering certification method/system.
Key findings: It is concluded that there is a lack of implementation of the SDGs in Brazilian municipalities, thus creating the method called BAH, an acronym that means Environmental and Humanized Benefit (in Portuguese), once the implementation of the SDGs generates benefits for the environment and for people, aligning and proposing public policies to municipalities.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: This study intended to contribute academically to the development of DSR in management, demonstrating its importance in helping to solve problems through artifacts, as in the managerial area and other applied social sciences encouraging the development of strategies to collaborate in the Agenda 2030 process.
Downloads
References
Almeida, F. (2002) O bom negócio da sustentabilidade. 1. ed., Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira.
Andery, M. A. et al. (2004). Para compreender a ciência: uma perspectiva histórica. Rio de Janeiro: Editora EDUC.
Ashley, P.A. (2002). Ética e responsabilidade social nos negócios. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Burgoyne, J. & James, K. T. (2006). Towards Best or Better Practice in Corporate Leadership Development: Operational Issues in Mode 2 and Design Science research. British Journal of Management, 17, 303-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00468.x
Brundtland, G. (1987). Relatório da Comissão Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento: Nosso Futuro Comum, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Çağdaş, V. & Stubkjær, E. (2011) Design research for cadastral systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35, 77-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.003
Callado, A. L. C. (2010). Modelo de mensuração de sustentabilidade empresarial: uma aplicação em vinícolas localizadas na Serra Gaúcha. Tese (Doutorado em Agronegócio), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto Alegre.
Castro Filho, C. M. de. (2018). Agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável: uma leitura de política pública na clave da biblioteca escolar. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 16 (3), 355–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v16i3.8650931
Chapman, G.; Cully, A.; Kosiol, J.; Macht, S.; Chapman, R.; Fitzgerald, J.& Gertsen, F.(2020). The wicked problem of measuring real-world research impact: Using sustainable development goals (SDGs) and targets in academia. Journal of Management & Organization, 26 (6), 1030-1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2020.16
Chakrabarti, A.(2010). A course for teaching design research methodology. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 317-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000223
De Faria, M.& De Paula, D. M. P. (2022). Agenda 2030 e a atuação do Poder Legislativo brasileiro. Cadernos Ibero-Americanos De Direito Sanitário, 11,84–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17566/ciads.v11i1.833
Drucker, P. F. (1984) Introdução à Administração. São Paulo: Pioneira.
Elkington, J. (2001). Canibais com Garfo e Faca. São Paulo: Makron Books.
Fischer, R. M. & Sampaio, J. R. (2002). Selos sociais: de moeda de troca à instrumento de responsabilidade social. Anais do III Seminário sobre Gestão Organizacional do Terceiro Setor. São Leopoldo: Universidade do Vale dos Sinos – UNISINOS.
George, G.; Howard-Greenville, J.; Joshi, A. & Tihanyi, L.(2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59 (6), 1880–1895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007
Guimarães, F. N.: Quintella, R. H. & Pimentel, R. (1999). Selo Social como instrumento de marketing: uma concepção estratégica de filantropia empresarial. Organização e Sociedade, 6 (14), 115-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-92301999000100005
Kuzma, E. L.; Doliveira, S. L. D.; Silva, Q. A. (2017). Competências para a sustentabilidade organizacional: uma revisão sistemática. Caderno EBAPE.BR, v.15, Edição Especial, Artigo 3, Rio de Janeiro. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395160726
Machado Filho, H. (2016). Roteiro para a Localização dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Implementação e Acompanhamento no nível subnacional. Brasília: ONUBR, 79.
Mazza, Patrícia Ikauta (2021). Education & Smart Cities: The Role of the Goals of Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development of Smart Cities. International Journal Innovative Studies in Socioly Humanities, 6 (2), 24-31.
Munck, L.; Souza, R. B. (2009). Gestão por competências e sustentabilidade empresarial: em busca de um quadro de análise. Gestão e Sociedade, 3(6), 254-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v3i6.667
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. (2015). Transformando Nosso Mundo: A Agenda 2030 para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br. Acesso em 02 de fevereiro de 2022.
ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas (2021). Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br. Acesso em 02 de outubro de 2021.
Pimentel, G. S. R. (2019). O Brasil e os Desafios da Educação e dos Educadores na Agenda 2030 da ONU. Revista Nova Paideia, 1 (3), 22-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36732/riep.v1i3.36
Popper, K. (2006). A Lógica da Pesquisa Científica. São Paulo: Cultrix,
ROMME, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as Design. Organization Science, 14 (5), 558-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769
Thomas, Ryan; Hsu, Angel & Weinfurter, Amy. (2021). Sustainable and inclusive – Evaluating urban sustainability indicators’ suitability for measuring progress towards SDG-11. EPB: Urban Analytics and City Science, SAGE, 48, 2346–2362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320975404
Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Scharf, R. (2004). Manual de Negócios Sustentáveis. São Paulo, Amigos da Terra.
Van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for FieldTested and Grounded Technological Rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (2), 219-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x
Vazquez-Brusr, D.; Piao, R. S.; De Melo, M. F. S.; Yaryd, R.T.; Carvalho, M. M. (2020). The governance of collaboration for sustainable development: Exploring the “black box”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120260
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Iberoamerican Journal of Competitive Intelligence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
