Análise Conceitual da Inovação Social no Campo de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas: Uma Revisão Bibliométrica da Literatura
PDF

Palavras-chave

Inovação Social
bibliometria
sustentabilidade
Economia Compartilhada
Empreendedorismo Social

Como Citar

Antônio de Lima, A., Ribeiro , T. de L. S., & Lavio de Oliveira, M. A. M. (2024). Análise Conceitual da Inovação Social no Campo de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas: Uma Revisão Bibliométrica da Literatura. Revista Inteligência Competitiva, 15(00), e0472. https://doi.org/10.24883/eagleSustainable.v15i.472

Resumo

Objetivo: Este estudo tem o objetivo de mapear a formação e a evolução conceitual teórica da inovação social no campo de ciências sociais aplicadas, como também fornecer um quadro integrado sobre os estudos mais influentes neste campo e das tendências de estudos futuros sobre a temática.

Metodologia/abordagem: É realizada uma análise bibliométrica para identificar os estudos mais influentes, as temáticas (clusters) dos estudos da área e as tendências de estudos futuros.

Originalidade/Relevância: A revisão bibliométrica elaborada nesta pesquisa permitiu identificar por meio do mapa de cocitação a estrutura intelectual que norteia a evolução dos estudos sobre inovação social corporativa no campo de ciências sociais aplicadas.

Principais conclusões: O pareamento bibliográfico identificou cinco clusters: Cocriação de Valor, Coprodução e Atributos que Potencializam a Inovação Social; Modelos Conceituais e Frameworks de Inovação Social; Economia Compartilhada e Novos Desafios e Oportunidades na Pesquisa de Inovação Social; Os Efeitos do Empreendedorismo Social na Inovação Social; e A Importância de Aspectos Institucionais no Apoio da Inovação Social.

Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: Nossas descobertas permitem uma visão integradas. A cocriação e coprodução enfatizam o valor da colaboração entre atores sociais, enquanto os modelos conceituais fornecem estrutura teórica para entender e guiar práticas inovadoras. A economia compartilhada surge como um cenário de transformação, oferecendo novas oportunidades e desafios em um mundo digital, e o empreendedorismo social contribui diretamente para a inovação ao aplicar soluções criativas para problemas sociais.

https://doi.org/10.24883/eagleSustainable.v15i.472
PDF

Referências

Ansari, S. M., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the 'bottom of the pyramid': The role of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0953-0

Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x

Bakker, F., Groenewegen, P., & den Hond, F. (2005). Social issues in management: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1101-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00556.x

Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507086426

Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370110

Bornstein, D. (1996). The spirit of entrepreneurship: A story of microfinance. Business Week. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002

Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Innova, 4(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1684/innova.2014.0021

Cajaíba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: A systematic review and future paths for research. The International Journal of Public Administration, 37(6), 491-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.903186

Cloutier, C. (2003). Social innovation: The conceptual framework. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 20(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00432.x

Cobo, M. J., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2011). The role of bibliometric indicators in the evaluation of research performance in scientific areas. Journal of Information Science, 37(3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551511405121

Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0591

Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2022). Social innovation: A theoretical framework. Research Policy, 51(4), 104543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104543

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090235

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Edwards-Schachter, M., & Wallace, M. (2017). Shaping the meaning of social innovation: A practical framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1033

Eig, A. (2014). The contraceptive pill: A historical perspective. Journal of Social History, 47(3), 626-642. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2014.0011

Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Fostering sustainable enterprise: A sensemaking perspective on social innovation. Organization Studies, 36(6), 1019-1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614561111

Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 292-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12073

Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded innovation in the context of the business environment. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-3

Griffin, A., & Prakash, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: A stakeholder approach. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 370-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12053

Gupta, B. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of literature on human factors in systems design. Information Processing & Management, 24(5), 559-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(88)90036-8

Harrisson, D., & Vezina, M. (2006). Social innovation: The role of civil society in the process of change. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2006v2n1a77

Harrisson, D., et al. (2010). The potential of social innovation in the contemporary economy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2010.519139

Helms, M. M., Oliver, J. K., & Webb, J. W. (2012). The role of social innovation in the sustainability of organizations. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.445

Herrera, J. (2016). Corporate social innovation: A framework for understanding the relationship between social innovation and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4939-4945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.019

Hochgerner, J. (2009). Innovation and social change. In Theoretical perspectives on social innovation (pp. 45-66). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11461-4_3

Jobber, D., & Simpson, J. (1988). The use of co-citation analysis in marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 6(1), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002324

Khan, F., Munir, K., & Willmott, H. (2007). A framework for understanding the role of social innovation in addressing social problems. Sociological Review, 55(3), 484-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00734.x

Koseoglu, M. A., Altintas, N., & Okumus, F. (2016). Bibliometric analysis of tourism research: A review of the literature. Tourism Management, 54, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.10.019

Lawrence, T. B., Dover, G., & Gallagher, D. J. (2014). The role of institutions in the emergence of social innovations. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1622-1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.022

Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Organization Studies, 23(6), 887-910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602236001

Marshakova, I. V. (1981). Co-citation analysis: A new approach to information retrieval. Soviet Journal of Information Science, 3(1), 14-20.

Martí, J. (2018). Social innovation: The role of organizational context. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1031-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3366-3

Martí, J., Courpasson, D., & Barbosa, A. P. (2013). Institutional theories and social innovation: A critical review. Organization Studies, 34(10), 1577-1603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495102

Martin, C. J., & Osberg, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship: A social innovation perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2014-0036

Mair, J., Wolf, M., & Seelos, C. (2016). The role of social entrepreneurs in institutional change: A theoretical framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(4), 344-363. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0063

Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How institutional context affects the creation of social value. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00131.x

McBurney, P. & Novak, K. (2002). The use of bibliometrics in public administration research. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(4), 391-417. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120015524

Moulaert, F. (2009). Social innovation and local development: A conceptual framework. European Planning Studies, 17(10), 1433-1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903127861

Moulaert, F. (2013). Social innovation: The social context and its implications for research and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.855697

Mulgan, G. (2006). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1143100

Nahi, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: A perspective on social issues in management. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 694-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2015-0045

Onsongo, J. (2019). Institutional voids and the legitimacy of social innovation: Evidence from Kenya. Journal of Business Research, 98, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.042

Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., & O’Regan, N. (2016). The role of social entrepreneurship in social innovation: A systematic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2715-1

Pinto, J. A., Ferreira, F. A., & Goulart, L. (2015). The impact of scientific productivity on the field of management: A bibliometric analysis. Management Research Review, 38(9), 938-956. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2014-0194

Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.05.001

Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or innovation we should care about? The International Journal of Public Administration, 32(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690802533093

Rayner, S. (2006). Wicked problems: The challenges of our time. Environment, 48(4), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.48.4.8-16

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Scherer, L. K., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of the literature on CSR and politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0862-0

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

Smets, M., Morris, T., & Verdewood, S. (2012). The role of social context in the emergence of social innovations. Organization Studies, 33(6), 737-760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612444055

Tracey, P., & Stott, N. (2017). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: The role of power in the creation of social change. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002

Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of organizational strategies. Systems Practice, 6(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692660

Turker, D., & Vural, C. (2017). The role of institutional supports in social innovation: Evidence from Turkey. Sustainability, 9(6), 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060957

Van Der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of inquiry. Research Policy, 45(9), 1766-1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.003

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer manual. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.10.pdf

Van Wijk, J., Stam, E., Elfring, T., Zietsma, C., & Den Hond, F. (2013). Social innovation: A new perspective on the role of institutional contexts in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 529-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.002

Vock, M. D., van Dolen, W., & Kolk, A. (2014). The role of business in the sustainability debate: The influence of stakeholder perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 733-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1766-2

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: The importance of outcomes. Public Management Review, 16(3), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.809200

Wijk, J., van Dolen, W., & Kolk, A. (2019). Social innovation: An institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 98, 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.046

Wijk, J., P. den Hond, F., & Van der Werf, S. (2019). Social innovation: A conceptual review. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3914-6

Westley, F., McGowan, K., Antadze, N., Blacklock, C., & Tjornbo, O. (2016). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: The role of power in the creation of social change. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002

Westley, F., McGowan, K., Antadze, N., Blacklock, C., & Tjornbo, O. (2014). The role of social innovation in advancing sustainability. Sustainability Science, 9(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0273-2

Ye, J., Song, J., & Li, H. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of research on social innovation: The case of China. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 673-687. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs022

Zhu, D. H., & Hsiao, C. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of the research in business education. Business Education Forum, 53(2), 13-17.

Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Inteligência Competitiva

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.