Palabras clave
Bibliometria
Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
Análise de Cocitação
Análise de Pareamento
Cómo citar
Resumen
Objetivo: o objetivo do estudo é analisar a evolução conceitual teórica do construto comunidades de práticas no campo das ciências sociais aplicadas e identificar as principais correntes teóricas existentes e as fronteiras do conhecimento da temática, a presente investigação volta-se para o avanço da compreensão desse fenômeno.
Metodologia/abordagem trata-se de um estudo revisional, elaborado por meio de uma análise bibliométrica, sendo que esta técnica permite o mapeamento do surgimento e evolução do conceito de comunidades de práticas (CoPs), inclusive possibilita identificar os autores mais citados/influentes, instituições dos autores e, redes de cooperação entre autores.
Originalidade/Relevância: a uma ausência na literature que permita idenficiar surgimento e evolução da temática de comunidades de práticas, como também compreender os desdobramentos de temas emergentes e tendências de estudos futuros.
Principais conclusões: A revisão bliométrica realizada neste estudo possibilitou identificar as principais bases teóricas que contribuíram para a formação do domínio de conhecimento de comunidades de práticas (CoP’s), como também as correntes teóricas atuais (fronteiriças e emergentes) que são as avenidas de estudos futuros sobre a temática.
.Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: A principal contribuição deste estudo refere-se a adoção da técnica de análise bibliométrica, ou seja, uma vez que trata-se de um estudo revisional que em tese permitirá que futuras pesquisas possam ser desenvolvidas para analisar em profundidade os resultados apresentados.
Citas
Bertels, H. M., Kleinschmidt, E. J., & Koen, P. A. (2011). Communities of practice versus organizational climate: Which one matters more to dispersed collaboration in the front end of innovation?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(5), 757-772.
Bresnen, M. (2016). Institutional development, divergence and change in the discipline of project management. International journal of project management, 34(2), 328-338.
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363-376.
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual review of information science and technology, 37(1), 179-255.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40-57.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization science, 12(2), 198-213.
Campos, I. M. S., de Morais Medeiros, J. W., & de Melo, M. S. M. (2018). Comunidade de prática (CoP) e aprendizagem organizacional no contexto da gestão de pessoas na Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB). Navus: Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia, 8(2), 17-26.
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California management review, 44(2), 25-46.
Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of information science, 31(6), 527-540.
Del Giudice, M., & Cillo, V. (2022). The spiral of knowledge creation in a dynamic and evolving business environment. The Routledge companion to knowledge management, 15-32.
Duguid, P. (2006). What talking about machines tells us. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1794-1804.
Duguid, P. (2008). Prologue: Community of practice then and now. Community, economic creativity, and organization, 1-10.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
Engeström, Y. (2013). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In Communities of practice (pp. 51-64). Routledge.
Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., & Dorion, E. C. H. (2022). Product Innovation: Path to Sustainable Competitive Advantage with Use of Environmental, Social and Governance Principles. Revista De Governança Corporativa, 9, e0117. https://doi.org/10.21434/IberoamericanJCG.v9i1.117
Jones, L., Ludi, E., & Levine, S. (2010). Towards a characterisation of adaptive capacity: a framework for analysing adaptive capacity at the local level. Overseas Development Institute, December.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
Lima, A. A., & Ribeiro, T. de L. S. . (2023). Análise Bibliométrica da Responsabilidade Social Corporativa no Campo das Ciências Sociais Aplicadas. Revista De Governança Corporativa, 10, e0135. https://doi.org/10.21434/IberoamericanJCG.v10igc.135
Lewis, S. (2017). Communities of Practice and PISA for Schools: Comparative Learning or a Mode of Educational Governance?. Education policy analysis archives, 25(92).
Marshakova, I. (1981). Citation networks in information science. Scientometrics, 3(1), 13-25.
Nelson, C. R. (2022). Integrating communities of practice to achieve common goals. Routledge Handbook of Rewilding.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY.
Orr, J. E. (2016). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Cornell University Press.
Pattinson, S., & Preece, D. (2014). Communities of practice, knowledge acquisition and innovation: a case study of science-based SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017). Thinking together: what makes communities of practice work?. Human relations, 70(4), 389-409.
Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2019). Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. Management Learning, 50(4), 482-499.
Quatrin, D. R., Klein, L. L., & Madruga, L. R. G. (2014). Redes interorganizacionais e sustentabilidade: onde esses dois temas se encontram?. Conhecimento Interativo, 7(2), 39-60.
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic management journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
Randhawa, K., Josserand, E., Schweitzer, J., & Logue, D. (2017). Knowledge collaboration between organizations and online communities: the role of open innovation intermediaries. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Ribeiro, T. de L., & Antônio de Lima, A. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG): Mapeamento e Análise de Clusters. Revista De Governança Corporativa, 9(1), e0120. https://doi.org/10.21434/IberoamericanJCG.v9i1.120
Rivera, J. C. (2011). Communities of practice: improving knowledge management in business. Business Education & Administration, 3(1), 101-111.
Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of management studies, 43(3), 623-639.
Rossignoli, F., Lionzo, A., Henschel, T., & Boers, B. (2023). Knowledge sharing in family SMEs: the role of communities of practice. Journal of Family Business Management.
Senge, P. M. (2017). The leaders new work: Building learning organizations. In Leadership perspectives (pp. 51-67). Routledge.
Schulte, B., Andresen, F., & Koller, H. (2020). Exploring the embeddedness of an informal community of practice within a formal organizational context: A case study in the German military. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(2), 153-179.
Silva, F. F., & Odelius, C. C. (2018). Organizational knowledge management and sharing: A study in the Federal Direct Administration. Innovation & Management Review.
Spoor, J. R., & Chu, M. T. (2018). The role of social identity and communities of practice in mergers and acquisitions. Group & Organization Management, 43(4), 623-647.
Strong, B., Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2008). Organizational governance of knowledge and learning. Knowledge and Process Management, 15(2), 150-157.
Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179-198). Springer, London.
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework.
Wenger, M. J., & Rhoten, S. E. (2020). Perceptual learning produces perceptual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(3), 455.
Wilbert, J. W., Dandolini, G. A., & Steil, A. V. (2018). Transformações conceituais de comunidades de prática: Da aprendizagem situada à gestão organizacional. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, 8, 102-117.
Zhu, X., Hu, J., Deng, S., Tan, Y., Qiu, C., Zhang, M., ... & Wen, Y. (2021). Bibliometric and visual analysis of research on the links between the gut microbiota and depression from 1999 to 2019. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 587670.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista Inteligência Competitiva